What’s your argument against an SLA with an MSP?

(And why it doesn’t hold water)

Managed IT services are becoming more popular by the day. Businesses, big and small, bring managed service providers on board to handle their IT requirements. The bigger IT players like IBM, Accenture, CISCO act as MSPs to larger organizations, while SMBs (small and medium sized businesses) often hire the typical managed service provider. However, there’s a question that crops up time and again–Do SMBs need an MSP? Unfortunately, SMBs are sometimes in two minds when bringing an MSP on board and typically use one of the following justifications:

Our IT requirements are limited

Many businesses in the small to mid-size range believe that their IT needs don’t warrant a full-time service level agreement with an MSP. They believe the only times they need to invest in IT are at the start of their business or rolling out new technology. As a result, they don’t see much value in signing a service level agreement with an MSP.

We are tight on budget

SMBs also tend to cut the IT budget and invest those funds elsewhere–generally in areas where they see tangible results, such as hiring new customer-facing staff or a new advertising campaign. So, when SMBs find themselves a little tight on the budget, the IT department sees the cut.

We have our in-house IT person/team

Businesses with an in-house IT expert or even a small in-house IT team feel sufficient for handling any IT needs, and an service level agreement (SLA) is just an added expenditure.

So, did your reason make it to the list? Stay tuned for our next blog post, where we will discuss how an SLA with a Wahaya IT can add value to your business.